Husbands and Wives
Written by Woody Allen
Okay, let’s begin this in earnest. You and me, talking
movies, talking original screenplays, the most consistently interesting
category at the Academy Awards. You get interesting concepts fleshed out,
quirky ideas, no sequels, no remakes, no adaptations of any kind. So where do
we start?
I find it very fitting that we start with Woody Allen,
one of your idols, so you already have a much stronger frame of reference for
this movie than I do. I love Woody, and I love his movies, but I’ve only
actually seen a handful of them. Annie Hall, Manhattan, the “Essential Woody
Allen” collection, if you will.
To get things out of the way so I can talk about the
actual script, though, it’s pretty interesting that this was the last Woody
movie Mia Farrow ever appeared in, and that it was released in the wake of all
that unpleasantness. The things that were going on in the real world in 1992
certainly lend this movie a contextual relevance it might not have had
otherwise. I’m not sure if that warrants further conversation, since we’re just
talking MOVIE here, but it’s worth
noting.
So onward towards “Husbands and Wives,” not the document
of Woody Allen’s tumultuous personal life, but the movie Woody Allen made
because he felt like it. It's wonderful and kind of funny that the very first
lines of the very first movie we watched for this project are a brief diatribe
on writing as a craft. You’re either good or you’re not. You can’t teach it.
Gabe (Woody) is a writing teacher who believes you can’t teach writing.
I was struck by how honest this movie was. I know Woody
has made as many dramas as he has comedies by I honestly believed, going into
this one, that I was about to watch a comedy. As such, the movie caught me off
guard. None of the four leads come off as particularly well-balanced people.
Every time you almost like someone, you get Jack berating his girlfriend
outside of a party, or Gabe attempting to seduce his student, or a confessional
from an ex-husband hinting at Judy’s true nature.
About those confessionals, too. At first they reminded me
of Spinal Tap, but the more I watched they seemed more like an early take on
the style employed by “The Office” and “Parks and Rec.” I cite those examples
partially because, with Spinal Tap, it makes sense that a documentary crew
would be following them. Why are cameras constantly on Michael Scott? Why are
they following this group of dissatisfied married couples? It makes no sense,
but it works well stylistically. This is how we can get Gabe to confess things
that he would never say to his friends. I really loved his addiction to
“kamikaze women,” who crash and burn but take with you with them.
The movie is also great at portraying that seething rage
that can accompany long-term relationships. These are people who can barely
stand each other but stay together largely out of obligation. Once Jack and
Sally announce their separation, Gabe and Judy see the opportunity to put the
kibosh on their own relationship. Gabe goes after Rain, Sally starts looking
for excuses to leave Gabe, etc.
About the only new coupling in the movie’s second act
that didn’t click with me was Mike falling head over heels for Sally. Not just
because Liam Neeson wasn't brutally murdering anyone with his bare hands while
talking angrily into a cell phone, but also because Sally is so cold. The movie
makes a point of that, but it never really goes into why Michael finds that so
appealing. Jack and Sally (a whole year before Nightmare Before Christmas!) are miserable people. It makes sense
that a younger woman would shack up with Jack, because he’s old, refined and
smart. It makes sense that they would end up back together, too. I just don’t
get Michael’s devotion to Sally, so strong that he nearly torpedoes his later relationship
with Judy over it.
Those are some rough thoughts. I definitely really liked
this one and was surprised by it at nearly every turn. I didn’t even realize
until just now that the characters talk about their kids a lot but we never
meet them. Are there any children in any Woody
Allen movie?
Anyway, onto Lorenzo’s Oil, I suppose!
No comments:
Post a Comment